I'm sure you will not be surprised to hear that Domino's Pizza is on the cusp of annoucing their newest offering : Anal Bread Balls
Ranch dip not included
Ranch dip not included
It seems like you're making a statement about correlation--one which anyone who's even dabbled in statistics would understand immediately.
If you're going to make a point, you should set a hypothesis and set out to rigorously support or disprove it. Simply pointing out that sometimes correlations aren't very useful doesn't really tell us anything about the ongoing controversy, because correlations aren't very important to the core of this problem. You're just rambling.
If you're going to make a point, you should set a hypothesis and set out to rigorously support or disprove it. Simply pointing out that sometimes correlations aren't very useful doesn't really tell us anything about the ongoing controversy, because correlations aren't very important to the core of this problem. You're just rambling.
I'm not even joking here, I LOVE THE SONG YOU MADE!! Can you please continue making music?? I know it might be hard to believe, but your voice is actually quite beautiful. And the range of your voice as well...its like I'm listening to an indie pop-rock star who put out their first EP.
Please...a full album. "ZugAddict's Worldview". You can sing about anything. I love the instruments you chose. In some strange way you remind me of very early modest mouse
Please...a full album. "ZugAddict's Worldview". You can sing about anything. I love the instruments you chose. In some strange way you remind me of very early modest mouse
Especially in the beginning of the scandal on cheating, i found it difficult to form an opinion, as i am lacking data. To me, a couple of videos changed my point-of-view, all by some ukrainian GM analysing Niemanns games from a couple of years back (not so much from recent history). And his findings convinced me, that Carlsen may have a general point (Hans did cheat OTB), but still nothing to prove about the actual games. I assume, that Hans did learn in the meantime, how to avoid getting caught throu current methods. not using EVERY engine suggestion, but sparsely using help at critical junctures only, which would be almost impossible to prove by todays means.
What what do i know? I am just a computer loving chess spectator trying to make up my mind.
And i disagree to the optimistic (or nationalistic) opinion from the article published via this blog.
Oh: At least one (of several) analysis can be found here:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pwtC0bH--A
What what do i know? I am just a computer loving chess spectator trying to make up my mind.
And i disagree to the optimistic (or nationalistic) opinion from the article published via this blog.
Oh: At least one (of several) analysis can be found here:
www.youtube.com/watch?v=8pwtC0bH--A
What's the point of this blog?
@tedwong said in #25:
> What's the point of this blog?
What's the point of this comment?
Heck , what's the point of points?
> What's the point of this blog?
What's the point of this comment?
Heck , what's the point of points?
the only clear opinion but perhaps there are others in other directions, is the last image of the video clip which i only had the energy or curiosity to watch, because the author mentioned doing a song. It was an original production.
but i think it does not matter. It is not really a sexual statement, i think it is about being rigid or something, of the constipation kind.
Otherwise it seemed more of the opinion that the amount of data evidence was all over the place, and my take that it did not matter what stance it was taking might be due to my stance that it is more about many people in chess seem to be affected by this ego based extreme atmosphere, that even very good players end up resorting to it in some tunnel vision.
Who says cheaters have something to compensate for, it may just be the same competitive drive push to a inhuman level (some might think it instinctive, but i say it is culturally amplified out of proportions with other drives) so that cheating is just an extension of the tunnel vision of winning on top of the world most tiered and pointed hat shaped coutour-ed competition... the king of the mountain sickness.... all affected...
cheating just a symptom. so whether there was cheating or not, the problem is the monster of cheating being such a monster... as symptom of a mentality or culture gone too far.
but i think it does not matter. It is not really a sexual statement, i think it is about being rigid or something, of the constipation kind.
Otherwise it seemed more of the opinion that the amount of data evidence was all over the place, and my take that it did not matter what stance it was taking might be due to my stance that it is more about many people in chess seem to be affected by this ego based extreme atmosphere, that even very good players end up resorting to it in some tunnel vision.
Who says cheaters have something to compensate for, it may just be the same competitive drive push to a inhuman level (some might think it instinctive, but i say it is culturally amplified out of proportions with other drives) so that cheating is just an extension of the tunnel vision of winning on top of the world most tiered and pointed hat shaped coutour-ed competition... the king of the mountain sickness.... all affected...
cheating just a symptom. so whether there was cheating or not, the problem is the monster of cheating being such a monster... as symptom of a mentality or culture gone too far.
this whole thing just shows how much treatment titled players get (if any other GM, made the accusation, they would be in serious trouble, but because it's Magnus....)
@tedwong said in #25:
> What's the point of this blog?
I just wanted make some graphs and promote my latest single. I leave the deeper insights for my twitch stream.
> What's the point of this blog?
I just wanted make some graphs and promote my latest single. I leave the deeper insights for my twitch stream.
Love how you waited until the very end to bring out the anal beads... classic. hahahaha