Although, that "#MaceChesscomGreatAgain!" thingy, erm, your platform seems more like Bernie Sanders' anti-establishment ("let's fight injustices" etc.) agenda, to be fair. :-P
Voting memberships in chess.com cost $100 each. @macer75 needs a contract where he pays for membership of everyone who supports him. He also needs to buy everyone a good computer with a chess engine installed. He also should open a Mace university and make all the GMs study how to blunder and pay for it from the tournament losses. If this guy loses the election he needs to be banned.
@ Neverness: The other main slogan for my campaign is #FeelTheMace.
Additional slogans include:
The Mace is mightier than the sword
The amacing race
Mace the force be with you
Ok stop, collaborate and listen Mace is back and I'm on a mission
@ Lightsss: Those are some interesting suggestions! The problem with adding 9000 to everyone's rating, however, is that it will make people complacent, and as a result they will stop playing. My goal in increasing ratings is in part to make sure that everyone is motivated by the possibility of achieving a high rating to keep playing, which currently isn't the case for those of us who, through no fault of their own, struggle to make it past 1000. But if everyone started out at 9000, they would think, wow, my rating is already so high that I don't even need to play anymore!
As for the 3-day punishment, it isn't so much a punishment as a way of saying, hey, you've been trying really hard to improve your rating, coming up with all of these high-tech solutions. You must be pretty tired at this point, so why not take a short break and enjoy some of the other things in life?
Also, what's up with the LM title? How do you get that?
Additional slogans include:
The Mace is mightier than the sword
The amacing race
Mace the force be with you
Ok stop, collaborate and listen Mace is back and I'm on a mission
@ Lightsss: Those are some interesting suggestions! The problem with adding 9000 to everyone's rating, however, is that it will make people complacent, and as a result they will stop playing. My goal in increasing ratings is in part to make sure that everyone is motivated by the possibility of achieving a high rating to keep playing, which currently isn't the case for those of us who, through no fault of their own, struggle to make it past 1000. But if everyone started out at 9000, they would think, wow, my rating is already so high that I don't even need to play anymore!
As for the 3-day punishment, it isn't so much a punishment as a way of saying, hey, you've been trying really hard to improve your rating, coming up with all of these high-tech solutions. You must be pretty tired at this point, so why not take a short break and enjoy some of the other things in life?
Also, what's up with the LM title? How do you get that?
or chesscom can just destroy itself and everyone can move to lichess.
Has Chess.com ever been great, though?
Considering chess.com is based in American and violates my freedom of speech. By only allowing me to talk every few seconds. Sometimes people even get banned for something they have said. This is a communist website located in America. So no thank you! I have more rights with this website and it's not even based in America! Thanks Mr. $$$.
This is not how 'freedom of speech' works. Freedom of speech means the government cannot censor you, Chess.com is not the government but a private business.
Which does not mean you can't or shouldn't pressure Chess.com to allow more speech.
It's based in America. Fuck you(That's how freedom of speech works). It's not private either btw.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.