"Stealth" cheaters?

@Asius Was talking about blitz.

I don't mind "obvious" cheaters. You know they're cheating during the game, and you have enough evidence to report them to the moderators.

I don't mind "stealthy ninja" cheaters as well. For instance: if they chose to win against you and use the computer a lot, it's heading to the "obvious" cheater. If they use the computer for like 30% it's also not such a big problem. It's still winnable. Also, IF they win a "cheating" game, you've lost maybe 20 points (with a low rated opponent). So what? You play 5 games, and you're back to your old rating. (I don't know how to math, but you get the idea).

Also, they don't enjoy the game. They're only focusing on how to hide their cheating while you are struggling to play the game and learn a thing or two.

So I don't really see any problems with these type of cheater.

@Asius judging from your reports I doubt you have found a single "stealth" cheater.

@lovlas wow, you are rude, i never claimed to do that, i just asked what people thought about something specific, nothing more, buddy. And i think i just reported 3 times, months ago, you can verify that, isn't?, make it public!. One was flagged as a cheater if i remember well, the other two i was probably mistaken, and i knew that. I'm not that experienced at chess as you seem to be. Now i don't really care to report to report cheaters, not even when there is 0 mistakes, because i have had those kind of games, and didn't cheat. If they are cheating, okay, i take it as a challenge, as if i were playing against an engine. I know i will get smashed, but i will try to play my best.

"I've seeing lately a lot of players that doesn't get detected by the current system as cheaters". <-- So you just didn't bother to report them?

I find lies ruder than facts. But that could just be me.

Read the post again, and you will understand the spirit, i think you are prejudging

How else am I too understand: "I've seeing lately a lot of players that doesn't get detected by the current system as cheaters".

Adding "discuss" at the end of the post doesn't change it.

Why do the people think that they can see more than a software which evaluates million points of meta data? I think a couple of games and the verdict is close to 100% safe. ACPL is just a pixel in the whole picture.

@lovlas So, you say i'm lying?, it wasn't 3 times then?, how many?, 4?. Again, make it public, i don't have any problem with that, i wan't to know. But im pretty sure i reported 3 or 4 times. Whatever, this is stupid, and we are getting away from what i wanted to hear, and i'm already satisfied with all the opinions that people made, specially those from experienced players. Conclusion for me: it's really difficult to find "stealth" cheaters.

Oh, I also said "but looking at their history i would say that you can GUESS they cheated several times". And i proceed to explain my doubt, because i wanted to hear other people thoughts. That's was the spirit buddy, not criticize anybody, people nor software, that tries to catch cheaters

I would like to ask you, on what basis do you make your inaccuRate conclusion that I have been cheating.
I would like yOu to be so kind as to check any and/or all of the games that I have playEd, it woujdnot take much effort to check and it would be clear thar I have not at any time cheated in any game that I have played,
Regards,
Ralph (aka charlox)