I mean it could have been over yesterday. If Prighozin had a bit bigger balls ...
We live in a small world and we all share something in common. Yet there are still wars. I believe it is high time for everyone in the world to undergo a genetic test, just to prove how closely related we all are. Maybe we need to know more about our roots. It could help us learn to coexist like a family. Whether we like it or not, every human life on this earth is part of the same family. To build a healthy future, wars must really end now. I hope everyone understands that a life lost in a war impacts generations to come. When one loses, everyone loses. Society is waiting for things to heal and move forward.
www.scientificamerican.com/article/humans-are-all-more-closely-related-than-we-commonly-think/
www.bbc.com/future/article/20210623-generational-amnesia-the-memory-loss-that-harms-the-planet
www.scientificamerican.com/article/humans-are-all-more-closely-related-than-we-commonly-think/
www.bbc.com/future/article/20210623-generational-amnesia-the-memory-loss-that-harms-the-planet
@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #1:
> So quite simply, in a couple of years Russia's stock will be depleted. There's already signs this is happening, because they're taking like 60 years old tanks out of storage.
You have noticed this very correctly. I even have secret footage where you can see how it happens.
youtu.be/FLcGaEcNjc0
> can Russia produce enugh new tanks to beat Ukraine on equiptment
Here it would be appropriate to show what the aspect ratio is in various types of military equipment at the moment.
Of course, if it's not secret data.
> So quite simply, in a couple of years Russia's stock will be depleted. There's already signs this is happening, because they're taking like 60 years old tanks out of storage.
You have noticed this very correctly. I even have secret footage where you can see how it happens.
youtu.be/FLcGaEcNjc0
> can Russia produce enugh new tanks to beat Ukraine on equiptment
Here it would be appropriate to show what the aspect ratio is in various types of military equipment at the moment.
Of course, if it's not secret data.
If Russia really wanted to win they could just conscript 500,000 recruits, maybe a million ... attack with human waves, 1 assault rifle per 5 people. That is what I am mostly worried about. Because that's how the Ukrainians lost Bakhmut...they were saying there were just too many people attacking.
They don't care about loss of life, and the army has no will to rebel because they get shot if they retreat, and no one seems willing to organize a rebellion amongst the civilian population. Everyone follows the order of the dictator for fear of reprisal, or because they are really that brainwashed to believe what he says. And the other thing that concerns me is long term support for Ukraine in the West. I think Europe is rock solid but US I'm not 100% sure about. Maybe 80% under Biden :). 20% under Trump, who loves Putin.
I really hope Ukraine has enough munitions. The one thing they are getting which is exciting are thousands of GLSDBs from the US but they are scheduled to arrive in a month, maybe two. But the West should realize this war will only end quickly when they provide Ukraine with sufficient munitions to do so. But now...a new problem is, that the West is not prepared for prolonged war, and don't have the manufacturing facilities nor the raw materials to keep producing munitions. Its surprising but true. So those ancient cold war era munitions are really saving Russia.
They don't care about loss of life, and the army has no will to rebel because they get shot if they retreat, and no one seems willing to organize a rebellion amongst the civilian population. Everyone follows the order of the dictator for fear of reprisal, or because they are really that brainwashed to believe what he says. And the other thing that concerns me is long term support for Ukraine in the West. I think Europe is rock solid but US I'm not 100% sure about. Maybe 80% under Biden :). 20% under Trump, who loves Putin.
I really hope Ukraine has enough munitions. The one thing they are getting which is exciting are thousands of GLSDBs from the US but they are scheduled to arrive in a month, maybe two. But the West should realize this war will only end quickly when they provide Ukraine with sufficient munitions to do so. But now...a new problem is, that the West is not prepared for prolonged war, and don't have the manufacturing facilities nor the raw materials to keep producing munitions. Its surprising but true. So those ancient cold war era munitions are really saving Russia.
@Raspberry_yoghurt said in #1:
> Anyway, when you loose 4K tanks in 14 months or fighting, you're going to have a problem when you hit 10K tanks lost - in like two years from now. The same goes for artillery and so on.
In war time, countries tend to produce more military equipment. Dont be surprised they already replaced them by now.
>So quite simply, in a couple of years Russia's stock will be depleted. There's already signs this is happening, because they're taking like 60 years old tanks out of storage.
They are sending the old junk now so the enemy spend shells on the outdated equipment and run their ammo low.
>Which is the same as asking "can Russia with 140 milion population outproduce the countries with more than one BILLION combined population that is giving stuff to Ukraine.
The rest of the countries are not in war time. They are giving equipment, yes. And probably will be enough to beat Russia, but they are not building more, at least not at the rate Russia should be.
>The war ends when Russia runs so low on military gear like tanks, helicopters, artillery, that they can't even control the country.
Maybe.
> Anyway, when you loose 4K tanks in 14 months or fighting, you're going to have a problem when you hit 10K tanks lost - in like two years from now. The same goes for artillery and so on.
In war time, countries tend to produce more military equipment. Dont be surprised they already replaced them by now.
>So quite simply, in a couple of years Russia's stock will be depleted. There's already signs this is happening, because they're taking like 60 years old tanks out of storage.
They are sending the old junk now so the enemy spend shells on the outdated equipment and run their ammo low.
>Which is the same as asking "can Russia with 140 milion population outproduce the countries with more than one BILLION combined population that is giving stuff to Ukraine.
The rest of the countries are not in war time. They are giving equipment, yes. And probably will be enough to beat Russia, but they are not building more, at least not at the rate Russia should be.
>The war ends when Russia runs so low on military gear like tanks, helicopters, artillery, that they can't even control the country.
Maybe.
How much more $$$ does «Ukraine» need if they are «winning» the war ?
How much $$$ has already been sent to the «Ukraine» for «winning» the war ?
How do you not «win» a «war» very quickly when literally BILLIONS of $$$ has been spent on said war ?
Are we really being told the truth...? What about what this guy says about the situation...?
www.bitchute.com/video/43rmJZ9PKGz7/
How much $$$ has already been sent to the «Ukraine» for «winning» the war ?
How do you not «win» a «war» very quickly when literally BILLIONS of $$$ has been spent on said war ?
Are we really being told the truth...? What about what this guy says about the situation...?
www.bitchute.com/video/43rmJZ9PKGz7/
Thankfully, Dr. Faucci has saved America (and the entire world, actually ...) so, what happens to Russia is like a flea-fart in a whirlwind ...
@Autofill said in #8:
> If by lose you mean quit then yes, of course. But putin will stay in power until he dies, and Ukraine wont ever invade Russia.
It's not important if Putin stays or not. One psycho or another won't make@kyanite111 said in #14:
> If Russia really wanted to win they could just conscript 500,000 recruits, maybe a million ... attack with human waves, 1 assault rifle per 5 people. That is what I am mostly worried about. Because that's how the Ukrainians lost Bakhmut...they were saying there were just too many people attacking.
>
> They don't care about loss of life, and the army has no will to rebel because they get shot if they retreat, and no one seems willing to organize a rebellion amongst the civilian population. Everyone follows the order of the dictator for fear of reprisal, or because they are really that brainwashed to believe what he says. And the other thing that concerns me is long term support for Ukraine in the West. I think Europe is rock solid but US I'm not 100% sure about. Maybe 80% under Biden :). 20% under Trump, who loves Putin.
>
> I really hope Ukraine has enough munitions. The one thing they are getting which is exciting are thousands of GLSDBs from the US but they are scheduled to arrive in a month, maybe two. But the West should realize this war will only end quickly when they provide Ukraine with sufficient munitions to do so. But now...a new problem is, that the West is not prepared for prolonged war, and don't have the manufacturing facilities nor the raw materials to keep producing munitions. Its surprising but true. So those ancient cold war era munitions are really saving Russia.
Conscripts with rifles are't worth much. They'd just get slaugthered and won't achieve much of anything.
The artillery munition was always going to be a tight, as the west acually doesn't use artillery much. We use air force for the same purpose. But production has been stepped up, like quadrupled already, and it should be ok.
> If by lose you mean quit then yes, of course. But putin will stay in power until he dies, and Ukraine wont ever invade Russia.
It's not important if Putin stays or not. One psycho or another won't make@kyanite111 said in #14:
> If Russia really wanted to win they could just conscript 500,000 recruits, maybe a million ... attack with human waves, 1 assault rifle per 5 people. That is what I am mostly worried about. Because that's how the Ukrainians lost Bakhmut...they were saying there were just too many people attacking.
>
> They don't care about loss of life, and the army has no will to rebel because they get shot if they retreat, and no one seems willing to organize a rebellion amongst the civilian population. Everyone follows the order of the dictator for fear of reprisal, or because they are really that brainwashed to believe what he says. And the other thing that concerns me is long term support for Ukraine in the West. I think Europe is rock solid but US I'm not 100% sure about. Maybe 80% under Biden :). 20% under Trump, who loves Putin.
>
> I really hope Ukraine has enough munitions. The one thing they are getting which is exciting are thousands of GLSDBs from the US but they are scheduled to arrive in a month, maybe two. But the West should realize this war will only end quickly when they provide Ukraine with sufficient munitions to do so. But now...a new problem is, that the West is not prepared for prolonged war, and don't have the manufacturing facilities nor the raw materials to keep producing munitions. Its surprising but true. So those ancient cold war era munitions are really saving Russia.
Conscripts with rifles are't worth much. They'd just get slaugthered and won't achieve much of anything.
The artillery munition was always going to be a tight, as the west acually doesn't use artillery much. We use air force for the same purpose. But production has been stepped up, like quadrupled already, and it should be ok.
@Elite-Strategist said in #16:
> How do you not «win» a «war» very quickly when literally BILLIONS of $$$ has been spent on said war ?
Because wars are expensive.
A quick google search (something you can also do if you wonder about the orice of stuff) tells me that USA spent 815 billion on the Iraq war for instance.
> How do you not «win» a «war» very quickly when literally BILLIONS of $$$ has been spent on said war ?
Because wars are expensive.
A quick google search (something you can also do if you wonder about the orice of stuff) tells me that USA spent 815 billion on the Iraq war for instance.
@Alientcp said in #15:
> In war time, countries tend to produce more military equipment. Dont be surprised they already replaced them by no
We know they cannot produce as much as they loose.
Also, they would not be using 50 year old tanks if they could make new and better ones. So that's another way we know it.
> They are sending the old junk now so the enemy spend shells on the outdated equipment and run their ammo low.
How come they didn't use old junk in the beginning and just started after they had lost 2K tanks?
> The rest of the countries are not in war time. They are giving equipment, yes. And probably will be enough to beat Russia, but they are not building more, at least not at the rate Russia should be.
Many countries have stepped up production. The German arms producer Rheinemetal for instance stepped up on producing Gepards.
In any case, USA has like thousands of Bradleys in storage. Anther thing is the "allies" can buy stuff Ukraine can use from whichever country has them and ship them Ukraine. Many countries have old tanks they'd be willing to sell.
> Maybe.
I just meant, we should not expect Russia to send every single tank down to the last one in storage in Ukraine. They need some for their basic defense. So it means Ukraine doesn't have to blow up ALL the 12K russian tanks, but maybe just 8K.
> In war time, countries tend to produce more military equipment. Dont be surprised they already replaced them by no
We know they cannot produce as much as they loose.
Also, they would not be using 50 year old tanks if they could make new and better ones. So that's another way we know it.
> They are sending the old junk now so the enemy spend shells on the outdated equipment and run their ammo low.
How come they didn't use old junk in the beginning and just started after they had lost 2K tanks?
> The rest of the countries are not in war time. They are giving equipment, yes. And probably will be enough to beat Russia, but they are not building more, at least not at the rate Russia should be.
Many countries have stepped up production. The German arms producer Rheinemetal for instance stepped up on producing Gepards.
In any case, USA has like thousands of Bradleys in storage. Anther thing is the "allies" can buy stuff Ukraine can use from whichever country has them and ship them Ukraine. Many countries have old tanks they'd be willing to sell.
> Maybe.
I just meant, we should not expect Russia to send every single tank down to the last one in storage in Ukraine. They need some for their basic defense. So it means Ukraine doesn't have to blow up ALL the 12K russian tanks, but maybe just 8K.
This topic has been archived and can no longer be replied to.